According to Bloomberg, US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Gary Gensler stated that the architecture used by Bank of New York Mellon (BNY) to provide digital asset custody services is not limited to the Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange traded funds (ETFs) that the bank is considering.

Earlier this week, BNY confirmed that it had submitted a plan to the Office of the Chief Accountant of the SEC to custody these two assets in a way that would protect customer funds in the event of a bank bankruptcy. The agency has expressed "no objection" to the plan, a regulatory term that allows the bank to not worry about its structure violating SEC requirements, which require banks to reflect the value of digital assets they hold on their balance sheets. BNY previously stated to Bloomberg that the SEC's no objection opinion only pertains to the use cases of ETFs.

"Although the actual consultation involves two types of crypto assets, the structure itself does not depend on which type of crypto asset it is." Gensler told Bloomberg after delivering a speech at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's annual U.S. treasury bond bond market meeting on Thursday: "It does not matter which crypto currency it is."

Gensler stated that the architecture proposed by BNY includes the use of individual cryptocurrency wallets, each with an independent bank account, and prohibits mixing with bank assets. He stated that whether to expand the scope of digital asset use cases suitable for custody depends on the bank's own decision.

Gensler praised BNY's preparation work in ensuring ownership of client assets, ensuring that they are not ranked last in debt repayment in the event of bankruptcy. In recent years, Celsius Network, FTX, Voyager Digital, and other digital asset platforms have gone bankrupt, leaving thousands of cryptocurrency traders in such a predicament.

Gensler said, "If this bank or any other bank uses the same structure, they will receive the same unanimous opinion

Gensler pointed out that multiple banks and brokers have been discussing potential digital asset custody frameworks that can separate client assets from banks, thereby avoiding the requirements of SAB 121. SAB 121 sets out the institution's balance sheet requirements for cryptocurrencies, which have been strongly opposed by the cryptocurrency industry. Earlier this year, US President Joe Biden vetoed congressional efforts to overturn SAB 121.

(责任编辑：银饰)

• ·微粒贷可以循环借几次，什么是循环额度？
• ·如何在OKX欧艺交易所注册长呼并开始交易
• ·火币张健
• ·小股票是什么意思-股票是什么意思大白话
• ·「避税天堂」瑞士的加密资产税收与监管制度
• ·随着购买力下降，预测山寨币市场的下一步走势
• ·火币手机交易
• ·在拍拍贷上做小额贷款利息高不高呢？
• ·Ripple 的悄然崛起：比特币 Maxis 是否应该担心 XRP 日益增长的影响力？
• ·dct代币发行价格
• ·宜人贷能自动还款吗，宜人贷的还款时间是什么时候？
• ·子公司分红给母公司交税吗
• ·个税申报的收入是扣除社保的吗
• ·2块钱的股票-2块钱的股票有哪些
• ·FARTCOIN能否突破1.5美元大关？市场信号显示潜在上涨趋势
• ·特朗普的贸易战使硅谷和全球互联网服务面临风险